ForeFlight vs. Garmin Pilot: Which mobile app is best for you?


Stop by your favorite general aviation airport on any Saturday and you’re likely to find pilots in a spirited discussion, defending the merits of a low-wing vs. high-wing airplanes, or north-up vs. track-up on a moving map display. It didn’t take long after the Wright Brothers’ first flight for pilots to form strong opinions in aviation, and today you won’t find a more debated topic than which iPad app is best for pilots: ForeFlight or Garmin Pilot.

Aviation app developers have come and gone since the iPad was released in 2010, and there are just a handful of single-solution apps used by pilots today, with ForeFlight and Garmin Pilot at the top of that list. The mission of both apps has also grown from electronic chart display to an integrated avionics system, and now they can do more than most certified avionics.

When you break it down though, the real question you should be asking is which app is best for me. Both apps have all the features and capabilities to feel right at home in the cockpit of a student pilot learning to fly, while simultaneously meeting the needs of professional pilots flying turbine airplanes. They’ve also grown to offer international chart and trip support thanks to partnerships with Jeppesen and Eurocontrol.

The Rise of the iPad

Prior to the iPad’s introduction in 2010, pilots primarily relied on handheld GPS receivers to provide supplemental airport data and a moving map in the cockpit. Garmin dominated this segment with a variety hardware options and screen sizes, selling for as much as $2,500. These portable GPS systems were a nice-to-have accessory in the cockpit, but didn’t replace paper charts or provide much in the way of preflight weather or trip planning. It also took some work and expense to keep the databases current.

Then, when the iPad was announced in 2010, pilots instantly recognized it as the long-awaited consumer product that could transform how data was managed and consumed in the cockpit. It was almost too good to be true: a slim tablet with a bright, responsive, 10” color touchscreen and a battery life that would outlast a 4-hour flight. And on the software side, ForeFlight was just as responsive and released a single-solution iPad app, building on the popularity of its iPhone version of the app. The paperless cockpit era had officially begun.

While they didn’t get the early jump like ForeFlight, Garmin debuted their full-featured Pilot app for iPad, iPhone and Android two years later in the spring of 2012. Garmin may have been the largest general aviation avionics company at that time, but they found themselves in the position of playing catch up in the mobile app market.

Garmin responded with a steady-stream of innovative feature additions over the past six years, which has allowed it to meet, and on some fronts exceed, the capabilities of every other aviation iPad app available today. Combined with its extensive portable and certified avionics connectivity options, Garmin is making the decision tougher than ever when deciding on the best app for your needs.

More similar than different

While the layout and user interface of these apps couldn’t be more different, you’ll quickly find that after spending some time with both apps they offer the same core capabilities:

  • Trip planning– airport data, FBOs details and fees, preflight weather briefing, aircraft performance profiles, electronic navlog, flight service weather briefing, weather imagery, ICAO flight plan support, pre-departure clearances (PDC)
  • Charts– FAA VFR Sectionals and TACs, IFR high and low altitude enroute charts, terminal procedures, worldwide Jeppesen VFR/IFR enroute and terminal procedures
  • In-Flight Navigation– digital flight instruments, synthetic vision, GPS-driven moving maps with geo-referenced charts and terrain awareness
  • Connectivity– ADS-B weather, SiriusXM satellite weather and entertainment, integration with Garmin panel-mount avionics
  • Digital assistant– weight & balance, logbook, aircraft checklists, track logging and scratchpad
  • Document Management – upload, view and edit flight-relevant documents like aircraft manuals, international paperwork and training documents

What you’ll find after using either app is that they really are a one-stop shop for everything you need to both prepare for and execute a flight. The next step is to dig deeper into each app’s core capabilities and see which provider will deliver an edge for you based on what, where, and how you fly.


ForeFlight’s design incorporates many of Apple’s standard iOS interface conventions, menus and controls, which eases the learning curve. It takes just a few taps to get to any location in the app which you’ll appreciate when you need to access information quickly, like finding an instrument approach chart or airspace information. ForeFlight uses the familiar iOS tab bar menu at the bottom of the screen to quickly switch between screens with one tap. Alternatively, the universal search function, accessible at the top of the Maps, Airports and Plates sections of the app, allows you to search for any type of data (airport info, chart, route, etc.) and jump to its location in the app.

After spending some time with ForeFlight, you’ll find many thoughtful features designed to make life easier for the GA pilot flying single-pilot. The app excels at taking routine data that we’ve been using for years and presenting it in a much more meaningful way. For example, when viewing an instrument approach chart or airport diagram, ForeFlight displays a shortcut on the screen to view all applicable NOTAMs about that procedure. And when an airport has a NOTAM for a closed runway, the app presents a bold red banner across the center of the airport info screen to make sure it doesn’t get overlooked. An automated chart pack option is available when planning a flight, allowing you to press one button to download all the VFR/IFR charts needed for the trip. Then, when new charts become available for download every 28 days, ForeFlight will automatically download them when you open the app, reducing the likelihood you’ll ever get stuck with old charts in flight.

When it comes time to plan a flight, the Flights section of the app guides you through each step of the process, eliminating the need to bounce around to gather and enter data. For IFR pilots, ForeFlight offers a Recommended Route feature to help choose the optimum IFR route. This routing engine analyzes thousands of possible options based on your detailed aircraft performance profile and time/fuel savings, while also accounting for your aircraft ceiling, preferred routes, and trending ATC cleared routes.

ForeFlight’s Alternate Advisor analyzes other similar filed flight plans, as well as time and fuel requirements, forecast weather conditions, available approach procedures to suggest IFR alternate airport to include in your flight plan.

Takeoff and landing performance planning is another unique capability within ForeFlight. This powerful feature will automatically calculate takeoff and landing performance data based on the aircraft profile selected for the flight. It factors in the current weather, runway variables and aircraft weight to automatically compute takeoff and landing distance (this does require a Performance Plus subscription).

There are just as many tools available in-flight when automation can really help. ForeFlight’s contextual alerts play the role of the digital copilot, and will alert you on the ground with both a visual and aural message as you approach and enter active runways. In the air, they’ll notify when approaching a TFR or the Washington, D.C. SFRA. From a flight safety standpoint, the app will alert you to cabin altitude concerns, nearby terrain/obstacles, high sink rates, descent through 500’ AGL, and nearby traffic when coupled with an ADS-B receiver.

There are also convenience alerts like displaying the ATIS frequency for the destination airport during the arrival, or displaying the nearby altimeter setting when descending through FL180. And the performance planning feature will warn you if computed takeoff or landing distances exceed available runway lengths.

Another standout ForeFlight feature is its dedication to providing a high-quality weather briefing experience. It includes all the essentials like text weather reports, forecasts and basic weather imagery, but then goes beyond with the inclusion of lesser-known forecast products. For example, on the airport weather screen, you’ll see a computer-generated text MOS Forecast next to the TAF that is available for over 2,000 airports in the U.S. and includes a 72 hour forecast period. You’ll also see a Forecast Discussion option that includes plain language notes from the forecaster who created the TAF describing the weather factors and confidence level that were considered.

ForeFlight includes a dedicated Weather Imagery section in the app that features a variety of forecast graphics and is by far the most comprehensive of any aviation app on the market. It aggregates data from a variety of sources, including the National Weather Service, Aviation Weather Center, Storm Prediction Center and Aviation Digital Data Service in one well-organized location. Here you can track long-range precipitation, thunderstorm, visibility and cloud coverage forecasts with easy-to-read graphics. If you don’t mind leaving your comfort zone and learning some new weather products, you’ll be rewarded with a better understanding of the weather before each flight.

For those who prefer the standard Flight Service weather briefing, ForeFlight is the only app to offer a graphical weather briefing option in the Flights section of the app, similar to what you’d find at, full of useful color graphics and images. This is a significant upgrade to traditional Flight Service briefings which were commonly referred to as the “wall of text” – useful information, but time-consuming to put into context.

ForeFlight seamlessly offers a subset of features designed for the turbine and professional pilot segment, offering an additional level of capability designed for the needs of high-performance operations. It includes custom aircraft performance profiles for hundreds of airplanes, ranging from piston-engine trainers to Citations and Boeing 737s, which makes long-range flight planning nearly effortless.

These profiles were created using data collected directly the manufacturer’s performance tables, providing highly accurate ETE and fuel calculations when planning a flight. The app will monitor your structural weight limits for each phase of flight, and offers various fuel policy options to assist with fuel planning. And since JetFuelX is a ForeFlight company, this free fuel card management program is nicely integrated into the app, allowing you to view contract fuel prices and request fuel releases directly from the Airports section.

For larger operators, ForeFlight’s optional Dispatch service allows pilots, dispatchers, management and other flight personnel to manage multiple flight plans for a fleet of aircraft. This collaborative flight planning feature makes flight planning much easier for corporate flight departments, and all the relevant details for each flight are sent right to the ForeFlight app on the assigned flight crew’s iPad or iPhone.

Garmin Pilot

Compared to ForeFlight’s start as a weather app, Garmin’s roots have always been in GPS navigation, and that’s where this app really excels. Pilots familiar with other Garmin navigation products, including the GTN 650/750 navigators, Aera portables and G1000 integrated flight deck, will feel right at home using Garmin’s data-driven moving map.

The app has a custom feel to it and doesn’t rely much on Apple’s standard iOS conventions and design. The icon-based main menu looks very similar to the home screen of the GTN 750 and FMS controllers used in Garmin’s OEM installations, again bringing an additional level of familiarity to those with previous Garmin experience. Similar to what you’d find on other Garmin navigation systems, there are nearly endless customization options for the moving map display, providing a high degree of control. The downside of this design is that it can lead you to overlook some key features and settings when first using the app, but nothing that can’t be sorted out with a little extra armchair flying.

The first major difference you’ll find on the map screen is the ability to launch a split-screen view with 11 different options to display alongside the map. Garmin’s implementation of these options is very well done, and allows you to keep an eye on your position on the chart graphically while simultaneously showing important items like taxiway diagrams, instrument approach charts, a flight plan screen, dedicated traffic display or terrain.

Flight instruments can either be displayed with the modern glass-cockpit layout, or using Garmin’s unique round instrument display. The synthetic vision display is visually appealing and uses the same graphics as their certified PFDs.

Similar to their panel-mount navigation systems, the Garmin Pilot app offers dedicated Direct-To and Nearest functions, which are always in view in the top menu bar. Pilots have learned to love the dedicated Direct-To button on just about every other aviation GPS device, so it only makes sense that it should be front and center in the app too.

The Nearest function highlights the nearby airports on the moving map that meet your preset criteria for runway surface type and length. It will also display a list of the nearest airports across the top of the screen – tap one of the symbols, press the Direct-To key and follow the magenta line to that airport.

Then there’s Garmin Pilot’s Emergency Mode, which is arguably the most useful in flight when things go south. When you need to take action quickly (engine failure, instrument failure, medical issue), tapping this button will activate a modified version of the Nearest function, highlighting all the airports on the map within gliding distance of your current position. It also activates the split screen view and displays the emergency checklist for your airplane. Well done, Garmin.

Pilots flying with ADS-B receivers will really appreciate the dedicated traffic screen, either in the full or split-screen view. This helps to keep the moving map screen decluttered and allows you to better identify nearby traffic when in busy airspace. This uses Garmin’s signature TargetTrend technology to show you where the aircraft will be in a user-configurable amount of time (say 2 minutes), depicted with a green trend line. You can easily filter targets based on relative altitude, and you can tap one to view its ground track, climb/descent rate, groundspeed and rate of closure.

Garmin Pilot has its share of smart features too, which provide contextual alerts. While these may not be as obvious as ForeFlight’s large pop-up displays and audio warnings, they can be very helpful once you know where to look for them. Start off with preflight planning – the app will constantly compare the weather reports for your planned departure and destination airports to the personal minimums you set in the app (maximum surface wind, minimum visibility and ceiling) and display a yellow triangle next to an airport ID on the Trip Planning screen when these will be exceeded, based on nearest TAF.

For IFR flights, it will display a similar caution symbol in the same location when the weather dictates an alternate airport is needed, and display a helpful Alternate Airport Selection Guide to help you find an option that meets the requirements of FAR 91.169. You will also be notified when your selected altitude is too low for terrain, when incomplete aircraft data is entered for filing a flight plan, and on the moving map when approaching controlled or special-use airspace.

While Garmin Pilot doesn’t offer the same level of support for professional aviation as ForeFlight, it does offer full integration with, a popular flight planning service used in corporate aviation. This allows you to create, edit and sync flight plans with and view all the relevant data right in the Garmin Pilot app. This also allows pilots to take advantage of’s premium services in Garmin Pilot, like pre-departure clearances (PDCs) and Electronic Advance Passenger Information System (eAPIS) filing.


Stratus 3 on dashAn important element to consider when choosing an app is connectivity. On the most basic level, you’ll want some type of GPS position source, and both apps are fully compatible with the internal GPS found on iPad models with the cellular data option and third-party GPS accessories from Bad Elf and Dual.

The next upgrade is adding a portable ADS-B receiver, which provides subscription-free weather and traffic. Both apps are only compatible with a few select ADS-B receivers which guarantees a reliable user experience and tight hardware/software integration. The Garmin GDL 50 (ADS-B only) and GDL 52 (ADS-B and SiriusXM) receivers work with both Garmin Pilot and ForeFlight, while the Sentry Mini, Sentry and Stratus receivers will only work with ForeFlight. The key takeaway here is to choose your app first, and then buy the compatible ADS-B receiver since they all offer excellent performance.

Both apps are also compatible with the same SiriusXM satellite weather options, which offers improved coverage over the ground-based ADS-B network. The Garmin GDL 51 is a dedicated SiriusXM receiver, while the Garmin GDL 52 is a hybrid device that delivers both ADS-B weather/traffic and SiriusXM weather from the same portable device. Both the GDL 51 and 52 work equally well with ForeFlight and Garmin Pilot.

The big advancement in recent years has been in connecting the iPad to the avionics in the panel, providing two-way flight plan transfers and an installed source of GPS, weather, AHRS and more. Garmin’s connected-panel system is called Connext and was initially designed to work exclusively with Garmin Pilot, but is now compatible with the ForeFlight app as well. Garmin avionics that offer this connectivity include the Flight Stream 110/210/510, GTX 345 ADS-B transponder, G3X experimental flight display and most of the new Garmin glass-cockpit systems installed in new aircraft.

There are a few Garmin connected-cockpit features that work exclusively with the Garmin Pilot app. First, you can only send SiriusXM satellite weather to Garmin Pilot using the Flight Stream system and an installed GDL 69 SiriusXM receiver (Flight Stream will send ADS-B weather to ForeFlight though). There’s also a time-saving feature, Database Concierge, that allows you to wirelessly update the databases on the GTN navigators from your iPad using the FlightStream 510. This can only be done with the Garmin Pilot app.

Garmin Pilot also interfaces with the Aera 660 portable GPS, D2 smartwatch collection, VIRB camera, inReach messenger and GSR 56 Iridium datalink for satellite calls and messaging. ForeFlight users, on the other hand, have the option to connect to additional avionics including the Avidyne 550/540/440 navigator, Dynon SkyView panel, and ADS-B transponders from L3, FreeFlight and uAvonix.

Making a decision

When choosing an app there’s more to consider than just how it looks and works on your iPad. Both apps include access to a version specifically designed for the iPhone’s smaller screen, which often serves a completely different purpose than the iPad. Many pilots prefer to use the iPhone version when away from the airport to look up airport and FBO info, weather maps, and for route planning, so spend time with this version while evaluating. It’s a great backup for charts in the cockpit too.

You may prefer an Android phone, but use an iPad in the airplane – Garmin has you covered since it works on Android and a subscription provides access to three separate devices. An additional consideration is whether you prefer to use a web browser on a computer for preflight planning. ForeFlight is unique in that it offers a full-featured web interface to view charts, weather, and plan a flight. This information syncs with the app on your iPhone and iPad.

You can’t go wrong with either app since both provide the core functionality to say goodbye to paper charts, but there are enough differences that it’s worth personally evaluating both applications to see which is a better fit for your preferences and type of flying. There is no risk in making the wrong choice, since you can try out both apps free for 30 days. Annual subscriptions start at less than $100 – which is the same amount you’d spend on paper charts for a 200 mile IFR cross-country flight.

Try both apps and you’ll likely find that one will ultimately feel right to you. Yes, you need to compare features, connectivity and pricing for premium features, but also spend some time thinking about which app you’ll feel comfortable with on your lap while flying a low-ILS approach in turbulence and driving rain. That’s what really matters.


ForeFlight offers several levels of performance, based on features and your type of flying:

Basic Plus: Flight planning, weather, VFR/IFR charts, weight and balance, logbook. $99/yr

Pro Plus: Everything in Basic Plus, plus geo-referenced approach charts, hazard advisor, synthetic vision, icing/turbulence/surface analysis weather layers. $199/yr

Performance Plus: Everything in Pro Plus, plus aircraft performance profiles, advanced planning engine, AviationCloud routes, fuel policies/safety checks, JetFuelX prices. $299/yr

You can also add additional database and charts for Canada or Europe for an extra $100/yr., or Jeppesen worldwide charts.

Click here for a complete comparison of ForeFlight subscription options.

Purchase a ForeFlight subscription here.

Garmin Pilot offers two packages:

U.S Standard: Flight planning, weather, VFR/IFR charts and terrain. $74.99/yr

U.S Premium: Everything in the standard package, plus geo-referenced approach charts, icing forecasts, Garmin FliteCharts, terrain/obstacle alerts, synthetic vision and SafeTaxi airport diagrams. $149/yr

You can also add additional international regions and Jeppesen charts to Garmin Pilot for an additional subscription fee.


  1. Another difference is that while the GDL 52 will interface with both ForeFlight and Pilot, the SiriusXM music feature can only be controlled by Pilot.

  2. I am looking at purchasing one of these solutions and I found this article instrumental in making my decision. It could have not come at a better time. The descriptions were through and very complete. I even discovered a few things that I had not uncovered in my research since I don’t currently own either product. Thank You.

  3. I like them both for different reasons but Foreflight and Pilot handle adding approaches/procedures differently and for this reason, I prefer Foreflight. I like allot of the graphical feature and the simple IFR map in Pilot at times. XM works better for me in Pilot
    When you select a procedure, from the procedures button, it will be added to the flight plan in Foreflight and will be added to the map as well. That does not happen in Pilot although you are able to select a procedure in Pilot, and the plate will add to the map. Unfortunately adding the procedure in Garmin pilot will NOT amend the flight plan so although we will see the plate, there will not be an amended flight plan, and the magenta line will not follow the approach. This works perfectly in Foreflight and that is a really important feature for me because when the procedure is added to the map, I get my selected waypoint procedure listing with time and planned info in the amended flight plan box. Its a detail but an important difference for me

    • Actually FlyQ has more subscribers than Garmin Pilot. I do use Garmin Pilot and FlyQ (FlyQ offers lifetime subs usually around Black Friday only…VFR @ $299, IFR @ $399). FlyQ is very proactive on upgrades & is very similar to FF now. Lots of features that equal FF and few touches to the next inquiry. I see evaluations on FlyQ & they don’t know how to use it, so the comments are crap.

      • I used to use Seattle Avionics and had a lifetime subscription to one of their platforms until they cancelled it and I was out of my “lifetime” subscription.
        I now use FF and will never go back to the other provider or consider another similar type subscription. Buyer beware…

  4. Agree with James Moss. This article is biased towards only evaluating the “big guys”. Seattle Avionics FlyQ and others deserve to be part of the discussion.

  5. Some items I thought would be improvements to both apps when evaluating in a side by side comparison:

    Garmin Pro: Split screen, Profile view of flight with Wx, Ability to scroll along flight plan to see Wx data along route.
    Garmin Con: Wx briefing is only textual – could benefit from some graphics, The app borders and background color are too dark and difficult to see in bright sunlight.

    ForeFlight Pro: Great Wx briefing, clean design
    ForeFlight Con: No weather depiction in profile view, Split screen capability would be nice.

    Both apps would benefit in the Wx briefing area with some sort of integration of the WeatherSpork app capabilities.

    • I’ve complained to Garmin a number of times about the blue letter keys on the black and they don’t listen. Maybe not pilots, but when it’s bright it is hard to dismiss or change because you can’t see the blue ‘key’. It’s just an app, so they could let the PIC choose the color that suits their environment better.

  6. I was also hoping for a comprehensive line-by-line comparison of the features at the end of the article.

    As the article states, they both have a lot of features and both have similar features. But as the article correctly stated there are “smart features” that are handled differently, to give me a better understanding of which one would be “…right for me.” A list with who has what and when they both had the same thing, a quick comment on which one the author (or the iPAD Pilot News team) thought had the edge.

  7. I have used both, but have been on Foreflight for the past several years. Perhaps Pilot has improved since I last used it, but I found the data update process to be agonizingly slow on Garmin. The Foreflight update process is quick and easy. The other Foreflight feature that sold me, was the ability to display all SIDS/STARS on the map to help one find the most relevant procedure to file. Garmin probably has this now too, I imagine. The previous comment about the difference in adding approaches to your flight plan is also key difference.
    I have always preferred Android over IOS, but the advantages to FF made the switch to the Ipad (for flying) worthwhile for me.

  8. I think the article was a good attempt at nothing really. Foreflight has next to no application outside the continental USA, at least Garmin Pilot does. Why so narrow?

    All good if you live in the USA but big article fail if you do.

    As the “ world’s largest pilot shop and a leading developer of iPad apps and accessories for pilots.” perhaps try to be a bit more worldly…..

    • Dave, ForeFlight has pretty good coverage outside the US. For example, there are full Canadian charts, European weather and flight plan filing, global Jepp chart options. Have you checked out those options?

  9. Not one single word about FltPlan, which for me is an immense asset to GP. FltPlan was never about nice graphics and eye candy, but targetting practical IFR solutions. One of them being well thought out FlightLog. “Notams in the last 12 hours”… feature comes to mind, as well as regrouping unusable navaids notams as one liners.

    • The title of the article is Foreflight vs Garmin – what did you expect? It’s like complaining that a Chevy vs Ford review didn’t talk about Toyota.

      I like Fltplan, don’t get me wrong. Not flashy but good tools and FREE!

  10. FlyQ EFB beats them both due to simplify of use, does everything an instrument rated or private (and most commercial) pilot could want. And half the price of Foreflight. I got the lifetime subscription and it works great. If you’re going to make comparisons, compare them all.

  11. FltPlan is entirely free and includes some features you pay extra for in either of the apps considered here. There are some drawbacks to it, like having to flightplan on the website and it cludgy data downloads, but it worth having as a backup and for its easy access to some data.

    The VFR version of WingX is also free, but the developer has not kept pace with other EFB developers, IMO, so I not longer feel it’s worth paying for to get IFR features.

    Of all the EFB apps, FlyQ is the easiest to learn. It has most of the features of these programs and some features of its own, like the focus on sharing flights with friends. There is also a free companion app, FlyQ Insight that is worth putting on any pilot’s device for its unique presentation of nearest airport.

    I also like Aerovie, the only EFB app that offers functionality in Apple Watch. It is now part of Appareo, so has new momentum. It gives a discount to EAA members too. Pretty easy to learn and use.

    I use ForeFlight but I’m not really a fan. I find it’s flightplanning approach to be awkward, but it does provide the best weather briefing, particularly winds aloft. It seems to be the most expensive when you begin to add features, some of which are free on FltPlan.

    I have and use all the above apps on my iPads, but Garmin Pilot is my go-to EFB app. For most things, I find it provides the info I need quickest and most conveniently and I prefer its moving map display. Despite the previous complaint, data downloads are as easy and quick as Foreflight’s. It also compliments the Garmin equipment in my panel and on my yoke (Aero 660).

  12. I have used both and still prefer ForeFlight. Maybe because I’ve been using it longer. Everyone needs to try both and determine what feels and fits their own ways better.

Comments are closed.