ForeFlight vs. Garmin Pilot: Which mobile app is best for you?

22

Ed. Note: This article originally appeared in the September 2018 edition of Flying Magazine, written by iPad Pilot News editor and Flying Magazine contributing editor Bret Koebbe.

Stop by your favorite general aviation airport on any Saturday and you’re likely to find pilots in a spirited discussion, defending the merits of a low-wing vs. high-wing airplanes, or north-up vs. track-up on a moving map display. It didn’t take long after the Wright Brothers’ first flight for pilots to form strong opinions in aviation, and today you won’t find a more debated topic than which iPad app is best for pilots: ForeFlight or Garmin Pilot.

Aviation app developers have come and gone since the iPad was released in 2010, and there are just a handful of single-solution apps used by pilots today, with ForeFlight and Garmin Pilot at the top of that list. The mission of both apps has also grown from electronic chart display to an integrated avionics system, and now they can do more than most certified avionics.

When you break it down though, the real question you should be asking is which app is best for me. Both apps have all the features and capabilities to feel right at home in the cockpit of a student pilot learning to fly, while simultaneously meeting the needs of professional pilots flying turbine airplanes. They’ve also grown to offer international chart and trip support thanks to partnerships with Jeppesen and Eurocontrol.

The Rise of the iPad

Prior to the iPad’s introduction in 2010, pilots primarily relied on handheld GPS receivers to provide supplemental airport data and a moving map in the cockpit. Garmin dominated this segment with a variety hardware options and screen sizes, selling for as much as $2,500. These portable GPS systems were a nice-to-have accessory in the cockpit, but didn’t replace paper charts or provide much in the way of preflight weather or trip planning. It also took some work and expense to keep the databases current.

Then, when the iPad was announced in 2010, pilots instantly recognized it as the long-awaited consumer product that could transform how data was managed and consumed in the cockpit. It was almost too good to be true: a slim tablet with a bright, responsive, 10” color touchscreen and a battery life that would outlast a 4-hour flight. And on the software side, ForeFlight was just as responsive and released a single-solution iPad app, building on the popularity of its iPhone version of the app. The paperless cockpit era had officially begun.

While they didn’t get the early jump like ForeFlight, Garmin debuted their full-featured Pilot app for iPad, iPhone and Android two years later in the spring of 2012. Garmin may have been the largest general aviation avionics company at that time, but they found themselves in the position of playing catch up in the mobile app market.

Garmin responded with a steady-stream of innovative feature additions over the past six years, which has allowed it to meet, and on some fronts exceed, the capabilities of every other aviation iPad app available today. Combined with its extensive portable and certified avionics connectivity options, Garmin is making the decision tougher than ever when deciding on the best app for your needs.

More similar than different

While the layout and user interface of these apps couldn’t be more different, you’ll quickly find that after spending some time with both apps they offer the same core capabilities:

  • Trip planning– airport/FBO data, preflight weather briefing, aircraft performance profiles, electronic navlog, flight service weather briefing, weather imagery, ICAO flight plan support
  • Charts– FAA VFR Sectionals and TACs, IFR high and low altitude enroute charts, terminal procedures, worldwide Jeppesen VFR/IFR enroute and terminal procedures
  • In-Flight Navigation– digital flight instruments, synthetic vision, GPS-driven moving maps with geo-referenced charts and terrain awareness
  • Connectivity– ADS-B weather, SiriusXM satellite weather and entertainment, integration with Garmin panel-mount avionics
  • Digital assistant– weight & balance, logbook, aircraft checklists, track logging and scratchpad

What you’ll find after using either app is that they really are a one-stop shop for everything you need to both prepare for and execute a flight. The next step is to dig deeper into each app’s core capabilities and see which provider will deliver an edge for you based on what, where, and how you fly.

ForeFlight

ForeFlight’s design incorporates many of Apple’s standard iOS interface conventions, menus and controls, which eases the learning curve. It takes just a few taps to get to any location in the app which you’ll appreciate when you need to access information quickly, like finding an instrument approach chart or airspace information. ForeFlight uses the familiar iOS tab bar menu at the bottom of the screen to quickly switch between screens with one tap. Alternatively, the universal search function, accessible at the top of the Maps, Airports and Plates sections of the app, allows you to search for any type of data (airport info, chart, route, etc.) and jump to its location in the app.

After spending some time with ForeFlight, you’ll find many thoughtful features designed to make life easier for the GA pilot flying single-pilot. The app excels at taking routine data that we’ve been using for years and presenting it in a much more meaningful way. For example, when viewing an instrument approach chart or airport diagram, ForeFlight displays a shortcut on the screen to view all applicable NOTAMs about that procedure. And when an airport has a NOTAM for a closed runway, the app presents a bold red banner across the center of the airport info screen to make sure it doesn’t get overlooked. An automated chart pack option is available when planning a flight, allowing you to press one button to download all the VFR/IFR charts needed for the trip. Then, when new charts become available for download every 28 days, ForeFlight will automatically download them when you open the app, reducing the likelihood you’ll ever get stuck with old charts in flight.

When it comes time to plan a flight, the Flights section of the app guides you through each step of the process, eliminating the need to bounce around to gather and enter data. For IFR pilots, ForeFlight offers a Recommended Route feature to help choose the optimum IFR route. This routing engine analyzes thousands of possible options based on your detailed aircraft performance profile and time/fuel savings, while also accounting for your aircraft ceiling, preferred routes, and trending ATC cleared routes.

There are just as many tools available in-flight when automation can really help. ForeFlight’s contextual alerts play the role of the digital copilot, and will alert you on the ground with both a visual and aural message as you approach and enter active runways. In the air, they’ll notify when approaching a TFR or the Washington, D.C. SFRA. From a flight safety standpoint, the app will alert you to cabin altitude concerns, nearby terrain/obstacles, high sink rates, descent through 500’ AGL, and nearby traffic when coupled with an ADS-B receiver. There are also convenience alerts like displaying the ATIS frequency for the destination airport during the arrival, or displaying the nearby altimeter setting when descending through FL180.

Another standout ForeFlight feature is its dedication to providing a high-quality weather briefing experience. It includes all the essentials like text weather reports, forecasts and basic weather imagery, but then goes beyond with the inclusion of lesser-known forecast products. For example, on the airport weather screen, you’ll see a computer-generated text MOS Forecast next to the TAF that is available for over 2,000 airports in the U.S. and includes a 72 hour forecast period. You’ll also see a Forecast Discussion option that includes plain language notes from the forecaster who created the TAF describing the weather factors and confidence level that were considered.

ForeFlight includes a dedicated Weather Imagery section in the app that features a variety of forecast graphics and is by far the most comprehensive of any aviation app on the market. It aggregates data from a variety of sources, including the National Weather Service, Aviation Weather Center, Storm Prediction Center and Aviation Digital Data Service in one well-organized location. Here you can track long-range precipitation, thunderstorm, visibility and cloud coverage forecasts with easy-to-read graphics. If you don’t mind leaving your comfort zone and learning some new weather products, you’ll be rewarded with a better understanding of the weather before each flight.

For those who prefer the standard Flight Service weather briefing, ForeFlight is the only app to offer a graphical weather briefing option in the Flights section of the app, similar to what you’d find at 1800WXBRIEF.com, full of useful color graphics and images. This is a significant upgrade to traditional Flight Service briefings which were commonly referred to as the “wall of text” – useful information, but time-consuming to put into context.

ForeFlight’s latest push has been into the turbine and professional pilot segment, offering an additional level of capability designed for the needs of high-performance operations. It includes custom aircraft performance profiles for hundreds of airplanes, ranging from piston-engine trainers to Citations and Boeing 737s, which makes long-range flight planning nearly effortless. These profiles were created using data collected directly the manufacturer’s performance tables, providing highly accurate ETE and fuel calculations when planning a flight. The app will monitor your structural weight limits for each phase of flight, and offers various fuel policy options to assist with fuel planning. And since JetFuelX is a ForeFlight company, this free fuel card management program is nicely integrated into the app, allowing you to view contract fuel prices and request fuel releases directly from the Airports section.

Garmin Pilot

Compared to ForeFlight’s start as a weather app, Garmin’s roots have always been in GPS navigation, and that’s where this app really excels. Pilots familiar with other Garmin navigation products, including the GTN 650/750 navigators, Aera portables and G1000 integrated flight deck, will feel right at home using Garmin’s data-driven moving map.

The app has a custom feel to it and doesn’t rely much on Apple’s standard iOS conventions and design. The icon-based main menu looks very similar to the home screen of the GTN 750 and FMS controllers used in Garmin’s OEM installations, again bringing an additional level of familiarity to those with previous Garmin experience. Similar to what you’d find on other Garmin navigation systems, there are nearly endless customization options for the moving map display, providing a high degree of control. The downside of this design is that it can lead you to overlook some key features and settings when first using the app, but nothing that can’t be sorted out with a little extra armchair flying.

The first major difference you’ll find on the map screen is the ability to launch a split screen view with 11 different options to display alongside the map. Garmin’s implementation of these options is very well done, and allows you to keep an eye on your position on the chart graphically while simultaneously showing important items like taxiway diagrams, instrument approach charts, a flight plan screen, dedicated traffic display or terrain.

Flight instruments can either be displayed with the modern glass-cockpit layout, or using Garmin’s unique round instrument display. The synthetic vision display is visually appealing and uses the same graphics as their certified PFDs.

Similar to their panel-mount navigation systems, the Garmin Pilot app offers dedicated Direct-To and Nearest functions, which are always in view in the top menu bar. Pilots have learned to love the dedicated Direct-To button on just about every other aviation GPS device, so it only makes sense that it should be front and center in the app too.

The Nearest function highlights the nearby airports on the moving map that meet your preset criteria for runway surface type and length. It will also display a list of the nearest airports across the top of the screen – tap one of the symbols, press the Direct-To key and follow the magenta line to that airport.

Then there’s Garmin Pilot’s Emergency Mode, which is arguably the most useful in flight when things go south. When you need to take action quickly (engine failure, instrument failure, medical issue), tapping this button will activate a modified version of the Nearest function, highlighting all the airports on the map within gliding distance of your current position. It also activates the split screen view and displays the emergency checklist for your airplane. Well done, Garmin.

Pilots flying with ADS-B receivers will really appreciate the dedicated traffic screen, either in the full or split screen view. This helps to keep the moving map screen decluttered and allows you to better identify nearby traffic when in busy airspace. This uses Garmin’s signature TargetTrend technology to show you where the aircraft will be in a user-configurable amount of time (say 2 minutes), depicted with a green trend line. You can easily filter targets based on relative altitude, and you can tap one to view its ground track, climb/descent rate, groundspeed and rate of closure.

Garmin Pilot has its share of smart features too, which provide contextual alerts. While these may not be as obvious as ForeFlight’s large pop-up displays and audio warnings, they can be very helpful once you know where to look for them. Start off with preflight planning – the app will constantly compare the weather reports for your planned departure and destination airports to the personal minimums you set in the app (maximum surface wind, minimum visibility and ceiling) and display a yellow triangle next to an airport ID on the Trip Planning screen when these will be exceeded, based on nearest TAF.

For IFR flights, it will display a similar caution symbol in the same location when the weather dictates an alternate airport is needed, and display a helpful Alternate Airport Selection Guide to help you find an option that meets the requirements of FAR 91.169. You will also be notified when your selected altitude is too low for terrain, when incomplete aircraft data is entered for filing a flight plan, and on the moving map when approaching controlled or special-use airspace.

Connectivity

Stratus 3 on dashAn important element to consider when choosing an app is connectivity. On the most basic level, you’ll want some type of GPS position source, and both apps are fully compatible with the internal GPS found on iPad models with the cellular data option and third-party GPS accessories from Bad Elf and Dual.

The next upgrade is adding a portable ADS-B receiver, which provides subscription-free weather and traffic. Both apps are only compatible with a few select ADS-B receivers which guarantees a reliable user experience and tight hardware/software integration. The Garmin GDL 50 (ADS-B only) and GDL 52 (ADS-B and SiriusXM) receivers work with both Garmin Pilot and ForeFlight, while the Scout, Sentry and Stratus receivers will only work with ForeFlight. The key takeaway here is to choose your app first, and then buy the compatible ADS-B receiver since they all offer excellent performance.

Both apps are also compatible with the same SiriusXM satellite weather options, which offers improved coverage over the ground-based ADS-B network. The Garmin GDL 51 is a dedicated SiriusXM receiver, while the Garmin GDL 52 is a hybrid device that delivers both ADS-B weather/traffic and SiriusXM weather from the same portable device. Both the GDL 51 and 52 work equally well with ForeFlight and Garmin Pilot.

The big advancement in recent years has been in connecting the iPad to the avionics in the panel, providing two-way flight plan transfers and an installed source of GPS, weather, AHRS and more. Garmin’s connected-panel system is called Connext and was initially designed to work exclusively with Garmin Pilot, but is now compatible with the ForeFlight app as well. Garmin avionics that offer this connectivity include the Flight Stream 110/210, GTX 345 ADS-B transponder, G3X experimental flight display and most of the new Garmin glass-cockpit systems installed in new aircraft.

There are a few Garmin connected-cockpit features that work exclusively with the Garmin Pilot app. First, you can only send SiriusXM satellite weather to Garmin Pilot using the Flight Stream system and an installed GDL 69 SiriusXM receiver (Flight Stream will send ADS-B weather to ForeFlight though). There’s also a time-saving feature, Database Concierge, that allows you to wirelessly update the databases on the GTN navigators from your iPad using the FlightStream 510. This can only be done with the Garmin Pilot app.

Garmin Pilot also interfaces with the Aera 660 portable GPS, D2 smartwatch collection, VIRB camera, inReach messenger and GSR 56 Iridium datalink for satellite calls and messaging. ForeFlight users, on the other hand, have the option to connect to additional avionics including the Avidyne 550/540/440 navigator, Dynon SkyView panel, and ADS-B transponders from L3, FreeFlight and uAvonix.

Making a decision

When choosing an app there’s more to consider than just how it looks and works on your iPad. Both apps include access to a version specifically designed for the iPhone’s smaller screen, which often serves a completely different purpose than the iPad. Many pilots prefer to use the iPhone version when away from the airport to look up airport and FBO info, weather and for route planning, so spend time with this version while evaluating. It’s a great backup for charts in the cockpit too.

You may prefer an Android phone, but use an iPad in the airplane – Garmin has you covered since it works on Android and a subscription provides access to three separate devices. An additional consideration is whether you prefer to use a web browser on a computer for preflight planning. ForeFlight is unique in that it offers a full-featured web interface to view charts, weather, and plan a flight. This information syncs with the app on your iPhone and iPad.

You can’t go wrong with either app since both provide the core functionality to say goodbye to paper charts, but there are enough differences that it’s worth personally evaluating both applications to see which is a better fit for your preferences and type of flying. There is no risk in making the wrong choice, since you can try out both apps free for 30 days. Annual subscriptions start at less than $100 – which is the same amount you’d spend on paper charts for a 200 mile IFR cross-country flight.

Try both apps and you’ll likely find that one will ultimately feel right to you. Yes, you need to compare features, connectivity and pricing for premium features, but also spend some time thinking about which app you’ll feel comfortable with on your lap while flying a low-ILS approach in turbulence and driving rain. That’s what really matters.

Pricing

ForeFlight offers several levels of performance, based on features and your type of flying:

Basic Plus: Flight planning, weather, VFR/IFR charts, weight and balance, logbook. $99/yr

Pro Plus: Everything in Basic Plus, plus geo-referenced approach charts, hazard advisor, synthetic vision, icing/turbulence/surface analysis weather layers. $199/yr

Performance Plus: Everything in Pro Plus, plus aircraft performance profiles, advanced planning engine, AviationCloud routes, fuel policies/safety checks, JetFuelX prices. $299/yr

You can also add additional database and charts for Canada or Europe for an extra $100/yr., or Jeppesen worldwide charts.

Click here for a complete comparison of ForeFlight subscription options.

Purchase a ForeFlight subscription here.

Garmin Pilot offers two packages:

U.S Standard: Flight planning, weather, VFR/IFR charts and terrain. 74.99/yr

U.S Premium: Everything in the standard package, plus geo-referenced approach charts, icing forecasts, Garmin FliteCharts, terrain/obstacle alerts, synthetic vision and SafeTaxi airport diagrams. $149/yr

You can also add additional international regions and Jeppesen charts to Garmin Pilot for an additional subscription fee.

Purchase a Garmin Pilot subscription here.

22 COMMENTS

  1. My plane is equipped with a Garmin 430W, which I currently pay $300 per year for a USA subscription. So, if I were to use Garmin Pilot, I would have to pay an additional $149 per year for the same data. Maybe money maker for Garmin, but for the user like myself, a big ripoff. I think I’ll stick with FlyQ and my lifetime subscription and save hundreds over the years. The only advantage to using Garmin Pilot is the ability to transfer a flight plan from Pilot to the 430W. Using FlyQ, I have to take an extra minute and manually input the flight plan into the 430W. A small price to pay to save hundreds.

  2. I have tried both, and ended up getting FlyQ Lifetime subscription VFR/IFR for $400. I enjoy using it on my iPhone, my iPad and on the computer to create my flight plans, check the weather and use as my primary flight display.

  3. I actually ran both for about 6 months, and found each to be exceptional cockpit aids.

    But I settled with the Garmin Pilot for one reason: the ability for it to exchange flight plan data via Bluetooth with my Aera 660.

    Which actually brings up an interesting point: hardware integration — which I think Garmin (naturally?) has a leg up on Foreflight.

    For the recreational, personal or light twin aviator still “trucking” a “steam guage” cockpit, I’ll give Foreflight the thumbs-up.

    But for the Operator desiring a cross-fleet, cross platform integration with the commonly installed Garmin avionics hardware, I’ll recommend Garmin Pilot. Reasonable minds will agree that — since the 650/750, and G-1000, that Garmin “owns” the cockpit.

  4. Have used both and I find ForeFlight convention to be more cogent and logical, which helps recall when entering flight plans or any other function. Otherwise both have similar useful information. Surprisingly Garmin GTX 345 ADS-B, when setup, integrates beautifully and quickly with ForeFlight better than it does with Garmin 796, which I have used since it came out.

    • I have the same setup. Will the Garmin 345 connect with both the Garmin 796 & the IPad Pro (running ForeFlight) at the same time? I like using the IPad to show ForeFlight map data with the Garmin 796 displaying Traffic or 3D flight data/Synthetic vision.

  5. I currently use both Garmin Pilot and Wing x Pro in my personal and CAP flying, but I have a small exposure to Foreflight through the excellent Pilot Workshops “Coast to Coast” video series. I am indeed intrigued by the seemingly outstanding preflight planning capabilities of ForeFlight. But the Garmin app is my choice for actually flying, particularly in my own Thorp T-211, which has installed only a whiskey compass in the way of navigation gear!

    The Garmin Pilot is, at heart, a navigator, and functions as such in a complete and outstanding manner. It is, with the exception of the VOR and voice radio (as well as the certified IFR Nav) capabilities, fully the equivalent of the GTN 750. I particularly appreciate the HSI indicator, since I have spent an entire 45 plus year career looking at those and find that precision navigation is easier with an HSI then by relying entirely on the moving map. The pricing structure is also good, in that the basic level provides all that you need for both VFR and IFR flying.

    It will be interesting to see how Garmin integrates the capabilities of Pilot with its new acquisition of Flightplan.com.

  6. I prefer Garmin Pilot for VFR and Foreflight for IFR. Most of my flying is VFR so I use Garmin the most. After you initially adjust the settings I find it faster to bring up information on Garmin. Foreflight is more complete using the pack feature for IFR.

  7. Garmin Pilot has some clear advantages over FF like the split screen – especially in combination with the widgets -, the EMER feature, the *far* more useful flight profile feature (+added time slider), the better depiction of airports on map incl. runway layout, the movable context ring on the map. The one main shortcoming are IFR approaches which for some reason are not supported by the Garmin Pilot FPL and rubberband path on the map (seriously..?!?) At the moment this is the single most issue that keeps me from switching to Pilot from the Foreflight camp.

    FF has great features, and much of what is great in GP has been copied from FF, so FF needs to get credit for that. The approach feature in FF is awesome, so is their flight briefing as well as letting the user overlay the useful Aeronautical features over every other map. But some things in FF are bananas… e.g. to this day TFRs and AIRMETS/SIGMETs are mutually exclusive, TO/Alternate Minimums information just slabs out the whole FAA binder and you have to scroll like mad instead of pointing you to the page you need – all low hanging fruit they managed to ignore for many update cycles, very frustrating.

    Both apps don‘t support some stuff I would love to see (map overlay that allows me to draw on any map just like I would on a chart) or a customizable Nav Log designed to support the XC flights during your pilot education, i.e. the app should calculate what it can to help you save time but also support filling in real-time updates from the pilot.

    By and large both apps are very good and super helpful, and I will continue to observe what both companies add and improve.

  8. Having tried both FF and GP, I opted for FF. Number one reason? FF loads SIDS, STARS, and approaches into the FPL (with all the waypoints). When I tested GP several months ago, if I wanted to add an approach into the FPL, I had to manually enter each waypoint. I even call GP customer support about this glaring omission and all the rep said was “maybe that feature will be available in the future”. Garmin’s GPS/ADS-B solutions are stoopid expensive – for a company the size of Garmin, they could sell their boxes for a lot less and still turn a profit.

    On the flip side, my one major gripe regarding FF is it’s Apple-specific. In this era of many different tablets available, FF takes the easy way out and forces users to buy an iPad. Apparently, FF developers don’t want to invest the time in building their app to work on the many different versions of Android that exist. To exclusively use iOS is, to me, just being intellectually lazy and ignoring a significant number of pilots who run Android devices.

    So, both FF and Garmin have their pros/cons – it all comes down to how we like each respective app. As an aside, I did also test FlyQ and while it’s a decent app, there were some minor annoyances with it – namely their use of “homemade” airport diagrams that lacked a lot of data.

    • I use both FF and GP and have the same gripe. I’ve told them at Airventure and online for over two years that FF loads the approach waypoints into the flight plan when I select the approach on the 430. Garmin stops navigating at the IAF. I just don’t get why they won’t do better than that. I told them if they allowed all the points to be loaded, GP would be my only app.

  9. They are probably all good – but I tried. love and continue to use Fly-Q with a very affordable lifetime subscription. I recommend those who are considering a system to check out Fly-Q (and its pricing) before making a final decision.

  10. Here is another VERY satisfied FlyQ customer. I test flew FF and FlyQ side by side and concluded that each had pro’s and con’s. But I am glad I went with FlyQ. Many of the concerns I had with FlyQ have been addressed. They have been very responsive to customer input. For light single and twin operations, I think FlyQ is the superior product.

  11. I started with Garmin as a student pilot. Very nice as we all know. When I purchased my plane and costs and reality sets in I decided I better research before I committed. Not having the resources after the big expense to update to a Garmin panel like I trained in I got with my EAA group up here at KCPU. ForeFlight was the king! Garmin was eliminated. FlyQ was something new so I did a side by side. Several calls to both companies revealed a more serious commitment to product and service to user with FlyQ. Awesome company! Went with FlyQ. Why. Because we fly! Guess what? Funny thing happened at KCPU, they all ended up moving to FlyQ. A couple still have both but when we fly together the preferred is FlyQ because of the extra features, ease of use, superior graphics and the new ‘Buddy Tail Numbers’ feature with traffic! I understand Bussiness and marketing what you sell, just wish you guys would not put FlyQ out of consideration each time you post these comparisons. FlyQ just overtook Garmin in market share and is growing…

  12. Wow no one commenting about FltplanGO. Recently acquired by Garmin but still run independently. They give you everything for “FREE” but no synthetic vision.

    Even includes the Canadian Maps/Charts and CFS. Full IFR and VFr planning and filing in Canada. Has integrated online eLog book. Flight path that can be saved and exported.

    Split screen modes and geo references charts. For those without an ADS-B solution you can build your own called StratuX even though they also support all of the other products on the market.

  13. I like both ForeFlight and Garmin Pilot. I have the Flight Stream 510 and it works great with Garmin Pilot. I have to say, Customer Service is much better with Garmin. I was able to call and get someone on the phone very easily to answer my questions. ForeFlight will only communicate with me via email. I was not able to resolve an issue with them this past week because of the limits of email communication. I was very disappointed in their Customer Service but I do like their product.

  14. I have used Foreflight from the beginning and like it. But honestly the cost of Apple devices is getting too crazy for this casual flyer. Assuming the Android capability of Garmin on an affordable tablet makes me want to switch. I’m gonna check into it.

  15. Having used Garmin products for s longtime I bought a subscription to the Garmin program, mainly because I hate Apple products. They left me in the lurch once, proprietary twits they are, and I went over to the Garmin. However, it was not an easy transfer and I did not understand the program well. I watched a lecture about how to use it, but the woman lecturer went too fast, pressed a lot of icons that I didn’t have and in general wasted my time. I reviewed the course afterward but no one at Garmin seemed to be interested. I tried FlyQ EFB but they want me to buy another box to work with proprietary Garmin, so I switched back to Foreflight and resurrected my idiot pad (the i is for idiot). So I am begrudgingly using Foreflight, which seems more intuitive than the Garmin and easier to navigate through. Also, Garmin seems to care less about my experience, where Foreflight assisted me with ease.

  16. I enjoy reading articles here, but we all need to keep one thing in mind. Ipadpilotnews is owned by Sportys. Sportys has a business relationship with Appareo and ForeFlight. Their joint relationship is an LLC called AFS. You can guess what company is the S in this relationship.

    Sportys should do what major media outlets do and that is to disclose relationships when they write articles/stories on something they own or have an interest in. ABC does this routinely when they report on Disney, their parent.

    When we see articles on Stratus ADS-B receivers and ForeFlight we should read understanding there is a business relationship. Do Stratus and ForeFlight get the same treatment (coverage) that their competitors do? You decide. I doubt you will read about any warts on either product, unless it’s a reader comment.

    To Ipadpilotnews – I encourage you to disclose any/all relationships you have on article you draft on those companies/products. You could have other business relationships besides AFS and your audience doesn’t care if you do. Just disclose them. It’s the ethical thing to do.

    • Bill, you’re right that we have a business relationship with Appareo and ForeFlight. We also have a decades-long partnership with Garmin, plus business relationships with Dual Electronics, Bad Elf, X-Naut, RAM Mounts, MyGoFlight, Pivot, SiriusXM, and others.

      We work very hard to cover the topics that readers ask about (if we get the same question three times we usually write up an article on it) and also to offer our opinions as pilots. Most of us work at Sporty’s, but we’re all actives pilots who fly with this stuff and that’s the perspective we try to share. There is room for opinion on a lot of topics, but we have no paid advertisements and no partners have any editorial control over anything written here.

LEAVE A REPLY